Tools · Practice economics
The personal TER calculator answers this for an employee: salary, minus tax, minus commute, divided by the hours it really costs you. A practice owner has a harder problem. Your hour carries payroll, occupancy, lab bills, PPO write-offs, debt service and the chair time nobody sat in. This calculator carries all of it.
Method comparison
Every vendor sells a tool on time saved. Almost none of them tell you what an hour of your time is worth, so the claim is unfalsifiable. Pick the changes you are considering, set your own volumes, and this converts the minutes into money at your TER. The library carries measured chair times from the published literature, including two methods that were measured as slower than what they replace.
Nothing added yet. Choose a comparison above. Every entry arrives pre-filled with the measured minutes from the study named on it; overwrite them with your own timings whenever you have them, because ten timed cases of each method will tell you more than any brochure.
BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025, by state. Hygienists 29-1292 and dental assistants 31-9091 are means. The front desk figure (43-6013) is a median, because BLS retired its static state tables and no longer publishes the state-level mean outside its query application.
An index estimate, not a lease quote. BEA Regional Price Parities for rents, 2024, scaling a national base rate you can override. No published per-state dental office rent per square foot exists.
Oregon DCBS 2024 premium rate ranking, used only as a relative state factor. That index is all-industry; NCCI class 8834 rates for dental offices are far lower, so you enter your carrier's rate and the state factor scales it.
State dental board fee schedules and administrative codes, plus Tax Foundation rates as of 1 January 2026. Four states (AR, CO, DE, ND) publish no dentist renewal fee, so those fall back to the national average and say so.
Dental CPA publications and consultancy datasets: Schiff CPA in Dental Economics, Percentology, PKF O'Connor Davies, Reciprocity Accounting. These reflect advised practices at 60 to 65 percent overhead; PKF puts the unadvised industry median at 75 percent.
Measured chair times from the published literature, each entry naming its study and sample size. Two entries show a loss: intraoral scanning was 0.6 to 2.2 min slower than alginate at the chair (AJODO 2018, n=180) and the Hall technique was 0.9 min slower than conventional restoration (BMC Oral Health 2007, n=132). Three more are flagged because the direction is proven but the minutes were never published.
Orthodontic figures come from the Orthodontic Products annual practice surveys 2021 to 2025, the AAO Economics survey, and AJODO systematic reviews. Pediatric figures come from the AAPD practice surveys and Business Metrics monograph, with Medicaid reimbursement from ADA HPI 2024. Where a specialty benchmark predates current wage or aligner economics, the band says so.
Chair utilisation has no published national benchmark. Neither does any per-state table of dental malpractice premiums. Both are yours to enter, and both move the result significantly.
Estimates for planning and reflection. Not financial, tax or legal advice.